Mathematicians Aim To Take Publishers Out of Publishing

The same way as at present. Reviewers are not paid, they are basically volunteers.

The traditional model works like this:
1) a paper is written (no one gets paid)
2) it's sent to a journal, where the editor (paid) looks and decides whether or not to pass it on to reviewers (only the journal staff are paid)
3) the paper is sent to reviewers who make comments and suggest whether to publish or not (no one gets paid)
4) if the paper is not-worthy it's sent back to the author/s who decided to revise and resubmit or whatever (no one gets paid)
5) if the paper is accepted, the author has to sign over copyright (no one gets paid)
6) the paper is published, and if the author wants more than the "complementary" copies, has to pay. If anyone else wants to see the article, they have to pay. The journal makes loads of money for very little work.

Another model cuts out the last two steps, and the journal makes their money from ads, donations, grants or other sponsorship (e.g. from a university). Another model has volunteers all the way through. It's not difficult.

Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotScience/~3/PDNiiCBBTTg/story01.htm

madonna half time show fiat 500 abarth madonna halftime m i a mia super bowl tom coughlin wes welker